The Impact of Biases in Survival Beliefs on Savings Behavior
Öffnen
Datum
2017-03-24
Autor
Groneck, Max
Ludwig, Alexander
Zimper, Alexander
SAFE No.
169
Metadata
Zur Langanzeige
Zusammenfassung
"On average young people ""undersave"" whereas old people ""oversave"" with respect to the rational expectations model of life-cycle consumption and savings. According to numerous studies on subjective survival beliefs, young people also ""underestimate"" whereas old people ""overestimate"" their objective survival chances on average. We take a structural behavioral economics approach to jointly address both empirical phenomena by embedding subjective survival beliefs that are consistent with these biases into a rank-dependent utility (RDU) model over life-cycle consumption. The resulting consumption behavior is dynamically inconsistent. Considering both naive and sophisticated RDU agents we show that within this framework underestimation of young age and overestimation of old age survival probabilities may (but need not) give rise to the joint occurrence of undersaving and oversaving. In contrast to this RDU model, the familiar quasi-hyperbolic discounting (QHD), which is nested as a special case, cannot generate oversaving."
Forschungsbereich
Macro Finance
Household Finance
Household Finance
Schlagworte
survival beliefs, ambiguity, choquet expected utility, dynamic inconsistency
JEL-Klassifizierung
D91, D83, E21
Forschungsdaten
Thema
Consumption
Monetary Policy
Investor Behaviour
Monetary Policy
Investor Behaviour
Beziehungen
1
Publikationstyp
Working Paper
Link zur Publikation
Collections
- LIF-SAFE Working Papers [334]